Sign in / Join

If Peter Thiel had been on Amazon’s board, Jeff Bezos wouldn’t ask him to depart


Peter Thiel, a really high-profile tech investor, has began to face some backlash about reportedly planning to donate $1.25 million in assist of the Trump marketing campaign.

This has put rather a lot within the tech neighborhood in a really precarious state of affairs. Thiel at the moment sits of Fb’s board, and the tech neighborhood is essentially outspoken in opposition to Donald Trump. Nonetheless, many executives — together with Fb CEO Mark Zuckerberg and YC accomplice Sam Altman — should reconcile Thiel’s assist and their affiliation with him. The response, largely, has been that private views and stances aren’t a purpose to push Thiel away.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos primarily re-iterated that right this moment. Requested what he would do if Thiel had been on Amazon’s board on stage on the Self-importance Truthful New Institution Summit, Bezos mentioned, “it’s method too divisive to say when you’ve got an opinion, you may’t sit on my board. That is not sensible.”

Fb, to date, has stood by protecting Thiel on the corporate’s board. “I do know there are sturdy views on the election this 12 months each within the US and world wide,” Zuckerberg mentioned in a publish on Fb. “We see them play out on Fb each day. Our neighborhood shall be stronger for all our variations — not solely in areas like race and gender, but in addition in areas like political ideology and faith.”

Nonetheless, Bezos’ tough reply when he’s fairly clearly at odds with Thiel’s opinions actually simply demonstrates the general downside that the tech trade faces on the subject of Thiel. He has invested in an enormous swath of know-how corporations along with his deep ties with the trade generally. However Thiel was additionally concerned in a lawsuit that led to the chapter and acquisition of Gawker’s property (minus Gawker itself).

“To try to chill the media and form of threaten retribution and retaliation, which is what [Trump has] completed in numerous instances, it simply isn’t applicable,” Bezos mentioned.

Bezos nonetheless went after Trump very aggressively: “It’s inappropriate for a presidential candidate to erode [democracy] round the perimeters,” he mentioned. “They need to be making an attempt to burnish it as an alternative of erode it. When you have a look at the sample of issues, it is usually saying that he could not give a swish concession speech, that erodes our democracy across the edges. Saying he would possibly lock up his opponent if he wins erodes democracy across the edges.”

When it comes to Thiel’s opinions, Bezos mainly simply made the argument that he’s most likely fallacious. “Peter Thiel is a contrarian, initially, and also you simply should keep in mind that contrarians are often fallacious. standard knowledge is often proper,” Bezos mentioned.

Featured Picture: Alex Wong/Getty Photos


Leave a reply